International Journal of New Chemistry
ISC, DOAJ, CAS, Google Scholar......

Adsorptive Removal and Solid Phase Microextraction of Neomycin Antibiotic by Graphene Oxide

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Anita Azimian
Nasrin Soltani
Nahid Tavakkoli

Department of Chemistry, Payame Noor University, P.O. Box 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/ijnc.2024.720718
Abstract
This study explored the use of graphene oxide (GO) as an efficient adsorbent for the removal and preconcentration of the antibiotic neomycin. Key parameters such as solution pH, adsorbent dosage, contact time, initial concentration, eluent solvent type, and eluent volume were optimized using a one-factor-at-a-time approach. Under optimal conditions, the method achieved a removal efficiency of 95%, and the calibration curve exhibited a linear response within a neomycin concentration range of 0.1-1 ppm. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were determined to be 0.033 ppm and 0.099 ppm, respectively. The method demonstrated high selectivity, with no significant interference observed from other substances. Finally, the developed approach was successfully applied to analyze neomycin in three different simulated industrial effluents, highlighting its practical applicability and effectiveness in real samples.

Keywords

Graphene oxide
Neomycin
Adsorption
Removal
Preconentration
Subjects
  1. Abdi, M. Vossoughi, N. M. Mahmoodi, et al., Ultrason. Sonochem. 39, 550 (2017).
  2. Sallam et al., Catal. Lett. 12, 3701 (2018).
  3. El-Subruiti, G. M. Eltaweil, A. S. Sallam, et al., Nano: Brief Rep. Rev. 14(10) (2019).
  4. Ling and F. M. Suah, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5, 785 (2017).
  5. Huang, W. Y. Chen, Y. S. Wan, et al., Environ. Sci., No. 7, 2604 (2015).
  6. Fda, B. Ls, B. Zh, et al., Chemosphere 239, 124764 (2020).
  7. Bekçi, C. Özveri, Y. Seki, and K. Yurdakoç, Hazard Mater. 154,254 (2008).
  8. Abdi, M. Vossoughi, N. M. Mahmoodi, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 326, 1145 (2017).
  9. Agarwal, I. Tyagi, V. K. Gupta, et al., J. Mol. Liq. 223, 1340 (2016).
  10. Ghorai, A. Sarkar, M. Raoufi, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 4766 (2014).
  11. Yao, S. Guo, C. Zeng, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 292, 90 (2015).
  12. Natarajan, H. C. Bajaj, and R. J. Tayade, J. Environ. Sci. 65, 201 (2018).
  13. Selvaraj, T. S. Karthika, C. Mansiya, et al., J. Mol. Struct. 1224, 129195 (2021).
  14. Giovanella, G. Vieira, I. R. Otero, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 382, 121024 (2020).
  15. Singh, V. Kumar, S. Datta, et al., Sci. Total Environ. 709, 135895 (2020).
  16. Wen Qinxue, Wang Jin, Zheng Mingming, et al., Chem. Environ. Prot. 35, 363 (2015).
  17. Kampouraki, D. A. Giannakoudakis, V. Nair, et al., Molecules 24, 4525 (2019).
  18. Shahmirzaee, A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, M. M. Husein, et al., Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 3, 320 (2019).
  19. Giliopoulos, A. Zamboulis, D. Giannakoudakis, et al., Zeitschr. Arznei Gewurzpflanz. 25, 185 (2020).
  20. Manousi, D. A. Giannakoudakis, E. Rosenberg, et al., Molecules 24, 4605 (2019).
International Journal of New Chemistry
Volume 11, Issue 4
Winter 2024
Pages 489-501

Home

Reviewers